> People shilling for nuclear is an entirely distinct issue, regardless of the data sources they're using to make their claims. These are people whose behavior

> People shilling for nuclear is an entirely distinct issue, regardless of the data sources they're using to make their claims. These are people whose behavior shows they are very clearly acting in bad faith -- throwaway accounts that post talking points. They almost exclusively use ElectricityMap to back up their claims. > Can you source a citation demonstrating "Nobody who is involved with the energy sector thinks ElectricityMap has any credibility." Of course not, nobody wants to go officially go on the record saying this and get handed a SLAPP lawsuit. But it's a known reality at this point. I don't know if the issues with ElectricityMap are due to data quality (or lack of data in some cases), but it's not reliable. Edit: for credible data, go to the official yearly figures reported by national and international agencies.