8 ms·
It was not unheard-of back in the film days. The cameras, like the Fuji GW690, were not exactly small, but you could carry them around on a neck-strap and use t
by jetrink 6y ago
It was not unheard-of back in the film days. The cameras, like the Fuji GW690, were not exactly small, but you could carry them around on a neck-strap and use them without a tripod.
1. http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Fujica_GW690 http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Fujica_GW690
- Exmoor 6y agoTrue, but the inherent costs of a medium format sensor (not even taking into account the likely extra costs of a curved sensor) mean that the bare minimum you could sell this fixed-lens camera for would be several thousand dollars. I just don't see a lot of photographers being willing to drop that much money on a camera that they can never expand the capabilities of.
- jeswin 6y agoThe Leica Q2 sells for $5000 dollars - I'm guessing it's (or was until Covid hit) selling decently. There would be many who'd prefer a light medium format with fixed lens instead of the Q2 if it's under 7K or 8K. It'll blow the Q2 out of the water.
- giuliomagnifico 6y agoLeica Q is one of the best selling camera for Leica, infact they raised the price 3/4 years ago. Also the Q2 had a 200€ price increase in EU (https://www.macfilos.com/2019/08/01/leica-q2-price-rises-in-germany/ https://www.macfilos.com/2019/08/01/leica-q2-price-rises-in-...). Leica has already a medium format camera (S) with interchangeable lenses, its super expansive but a medium format Leica with fixed lens for (example) 9000$ I think would sell really a lot. Also a Sony medium format for 7/8000€ would sell a lot (more than Leica surely). We’ll see...
- achamayou 6y agoA GS645w isn’t much larger than a modern 35mm digital, and is certainly lighter.
- brudgers 6y agoQuite a lot of medium format cameras were fixed lens. Pretty much all the TLR’s (except some Mamiya’s). All the folders (to a first approximation), the Brownies, and even today all those Holgas.