4 ms·

Actually, with the data from the servers, they will be able to show when the software was ordered to start switching votes. They will be able to petition SCOTU

Actually, with the data from the servers, they will be able to show when the software was ordered to start switching votes. They will be able to petition SCOTUS to nullify the election because of such broad foreign election interference and send it to the House. And as far as a coup attempt, there hasn't been any certification of the election results yet. How could there be a coup when the results aren't yet known? What did you think about the CIA not being invited to the overseas raid? Methinks the Fed Govt. is learning how to do without them, almost as if the CIA's days are numbered. https://www.bitchute.com/video/K8aPVcG2rvI0/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/K8aPVcG2rvI0/

shadowgovt 6y ago
You can get people to believe anything you want when you make stuff up. https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363 https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pennsylvania-election-2020-pat-toomey-trump-claims/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pennsylvania-election-2020-pat-... At this point, the best reason I can propose that the CIA wasn't invited to the overseas raid is there wasn't an overseas raid. This is Comet Ping Pong all over again and I'm watching you fall for it in realtime. It's sad. :(
- Fjolsvith 6y ago
  https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-attorney-sidney-powell-coinfirms-alleged-dominion-servers-germany-confiscated-video/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-attorney-sidne...
  - shadowgovt 6y ago
    The lawyer of the man suing to have the American election overturned is not a reliable source of factual information. That's like believing Charles Manson's lawyer when he says his client is innocent. Get a third-party confirmation on anything Sidney Powell does not say under oath. Even in the quote from her, we can see she is not the primary source on this information. "But I do not know if good guys got it or bad guys got it." She's relaying information she's received second-hand, and since her client is known to believe unsubstantiated conspiracy theory, it's safe to assume a modest probability that the second-hand source is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. (Also, as a useful first-pass filter on baloney, any news story that starts with a blast-word like "HUGE!" is probably not going to pass the sniff test for veracity. Rags use blast-words because they have to make up for their lack of integrity with spectacle. News organizations with a reputation to lose just use short-sentence headlines). https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/heres-how-seriously-you-should-take-trump-legal-teams-conspiracy-theories/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/heres-how...
    - shadowgovt 6y ago
      ... hell, she's not even his lawyer anymore. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756 https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756
      - Fjolsvith 6y ago
        Never was. Here is Trump's path to power, described by Tim Pool: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhLYeXG1hgg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhLYeXG1hgg 4D chess, I'm telling you.
        shadowgovt 6y ago
        Pool does fine reporting, but I'm going to defer to lawyers on this topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6sVow9l8H4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6sVow9l8H4 And I don't know where you get the idea that Powell wasn't part of the President's legal team. Are you calling the President a liar? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1327811527123103746 https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/13278115271231037...
        Fjolsvith 6y ago
        Whoah. A tweet that wasn't disputed by @Jack's organization, that bastion of fact checking. https://www.wsj.com/articles/giuliani-says-sidney-powell-not-part-of-trumps-legal-team-11606088107 https://www.wsj.com/articles/giuliani-says-sidney-powell-not... Powell wasn't representing Trump. However, she is definitely on "Team Patriot".
        shadowgovt 6y ago
        a) Trump is a primary source of what Trump said; there's no fact checking involved. You either take Trump as a reliable source of info about himself, or you don't. If you don't, this entire conversation is moot because you're claiming a guy who can't even tell who his legal team is is playing 4D chess. If you're trusting some "my mother's cousin's sister works at the Pentagon and she heard what's really going on is" source over the words of the plaintiff in these cases, that's your problem. b) Check the dates of the tweet vs. the headline. She was on his legal team; now she's not. Kicked off. Incompetent hiring isn't 4D chess. Honestly, this is the problem with QAnon. If the only way to conclude the dumbest guy in the room is actually the smartest guy in the room is to assume he's the smartest guy in the room and to work backwards to figure out how that might possibly be true, Occam's Razor suggests we already have our answer.

shadowgovt 6y ago

You can get people to believe anything you want when you make stuff up. https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363 https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pennsylvania-election-2020-pat-toomey-trump-claims/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pennsylvania-election-2020-pat-... At this point, the best reason I can propose that the CIA wasn't invited to the overseas raid is there wasn't an overseas raid. This is Comet Ping Pong all over again and I'm watching you fall for it in realtime. It's sad. :(

Fjolsvith 6y ago
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-attorney-sidney-powell-coinfirms-alleged-dominion-servers-germany-confiscated-video/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-attorney-sidne...
- shadowgovt 6y ago
  The lawyer of the man suing to have the American election overturned is not a reliable source of factual information. That's like believing Charles Manson's lawyer when he says his client is innocent. Get a third-party confirmation on anything Sidney Powell does not say under oath. Even in the quote from her, we can see she is not the primary source on this information. "But I do not know if good guys got it or bad guys got it." She's relaying information she's received second-hand, and since her client is known to believe unsubstantiated conspiracy theory, it's safe to assume a modest probability that the second-hand source is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. (Also, as a useful first-pass filter on baloney, any news story that starts with a blast-word like "HUGE!" is probably not going to pass the sniff test for veracity. Rags use blast-words because they have to make up for their lack of integrity with spectacle. News organizations with a reputation to lose just use short-sentence headlines). https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/heres-how-seriously-you-should-take-trump-legal-teams-conspiracy-theories/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/heres-how...
  - shadowgovt 6y ago
    ... hell, she's not even his lawyer anymore. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756 https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756
    - Fjolsvith 6y ago
      Never was. Here is Trump's path to power, described by Tim Pool: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhLYeXG1hgg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhLYeXG1hgg 4D chess, I'm telling you.
      - shadowgovt 6y ago
        Pool does fine reporting, but I'm going to defer to lawyers on this topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6sVow9l8H4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6sVow9l8H4 And I don't know where you get the idea that Powell wasn't part of the President's legal team. Are you calling the President a liar? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1327811527123103746 https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/13278115271231037...
        Fjolsvith 6y ago
        Whoah. A tweet that wasn't disputed by @Jack's organization, that bastion of fact checking. https://www.wsj.com/articles/giuliani-says-sidney-powell-not-part-of-trumps-legal-team-11606088107 https://www.wsj.com/articles/giuliani-says-sidney-powell-not... Powell wasn't representing Trump. However, she is definitely on "Team Patriot".
        shadowgovt 6y ago
        a) Trump is a primary source of what Trump said; there's no fact checking involved. You either take Trump as a reliable source of info about himself, or you don't. If you don't, this entire conversation is moot because you're claiming a guy who can't even tell who his legal team is is playing 4D chess. If you're trusting some "my mother's cousin's sister works at the Pentagon and she heard what's really going on is" source over the words of the plaintiff in these cases, that's your problem. b) Check the dates of the tweet vs. the headline. She was on his legal team; now she's not. Kicked off. Incompetent hiring isn't 4D chess. Honestly, this is the problem with QAnon. If the only way to conclude the dumbest guy in the room is actually the smartest guy in the room is to assume he's the smartest guy in the room and to work backwards to figure out how that might possibly be true, Occam's Razor suggests we already have our answer.