3 ms·
"we can't measure it" doesn't imply "it doesn't exist". Maybe it exists, maybe not. Let's improve our tools and try again. For example, it's impossible to meas
by drran 6y ago
"we can't measure it" doesn't imply "it doesn't exist". Maybe it exists, maybe not. Let's improve our tools and try again.
For example, it's impossible to measure distances shorter than photon wave length using photon stream, but it's easy to do using beam splitter and interference.
- fsflover 6y agoI never suggested that it didn't exist. It's just not a simple ball-like or point-like object, more like a cloud changing its form perhaps.
- goldenkey 6y agoYour understanding of what is quantum and what is not, is dead wrong. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/giant-molecules-exist-in-two-places-at-once-in-unprecedented-quantum-experiment/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/giant-molecules-e...
- drran 6y agoIMHO, you should look at this video, where water droplet at macro scale «exists in two places at once» (demonstrates self interference when passing two slits). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsaUX48t0w8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsaUX48t0w8