5 ms·
You are giving them too much credit. Humans only observe really local information and are, in most cases, unable to grasp the actual dynamics of the society, le
by PartiallyTyped 6y ago
You are giving them too much credit. Humans only observe really local information and are, in most cases, unable to grasp the actual dynamics of the society, let alone 'what is beneficial' for it.
Chess can be used as a means of showing that any skill can be learned [1].
[1] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/200507/the-grandmaster-experiment https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/200507/the-grand...
- westwing 6y agoI'm not talking about complex societies, but about the kind of small tribes that we evolved in, where such information is local. School classes resemble such tribes. If bullying was simply dominating behavior, it should be generally directed at anyone, yet it more commonly affects the stereotypical nerd. In any case, this isn't to give credit to bullies. There is no credit to be given for behavior that I consider innate.
- PartiallyTyped 6y agoApologies, by credit I meant to express that the causal relationship you are looking for may not exist. > If bullying was simply dominating behavior, it should be generally directed at anyone, yet it more commonly affects the stereotypical nerd. But then you risk a coalition that will shun you. A nerd is perceived as 'the weakest' of the tribe, this enables the rest of the tribe to bully the nerd by proxy, you give them somebody to look down on, without the risk of the nerd retaliating.