6 ms·
Hate to be cynical but here's to hoping it's not to destroy evidence.
by halturing 6y ago
Hate to be cynical but here's to hoping it's not to destroy evidence.
- shadowgovt 6y agoThe Feds have not seized the backend servers of these voting systems. https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363 https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363 https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-election-syctl-military/fact-check-the-u-s-military-has-not-seized-election-servers-in-germany-idUSKBN27W1UW https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-election-syctl-... "DC Dirty Laundry" is, in general, not a reliable source for news. https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/DCDirtyLaundry-label.pdf https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/DCD...
- Fjolsvith 6y agohttps://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-attorney-sidney-powell-coinfirms-alleged-dominion-servers-germany-confiscated-video/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-attorney-sidne... SHTF: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMIQbsTfH3E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMIQbsTfH3E Enjoy the show.
- shadowgovt 6y agoTaking the president's attorney's word for it when there is no third party corroboration is like trusting Charles Manson's attorney when he says Charles Manson is innocent. Obvious conflict of interest on the source of the information. Let's see some actual proof. So far nobody with any credibility, including the company that was ostensibly raided, claims a raid happened.
- shadowgovt 6y ago... in fact, she's no longer his lawyer. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756 https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756
- Fjolsvith 6y agoShe never was his lawyer. She's a military prosecutor who can bring charges under the UCMJ.
- shadowgovt 6y ago> She never was his lawyer Your relationship to facts is increasingly strained. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1327811527123103746 https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/13278115271231037... And the UCMJ is irrelevant to the outcome of the election. With the sole exception of the process of collection of military overseas ballots, the election is an entirely civilian and mostly state-level process that has no involvement from the military.
- Number157 6y agoA tweet by whoever is in charge of Trumps twitter account is considered accurate information? "Your relationship to facts is increasingly strained."
- shadowgovt 6y agoAs he allows the person running his Twitter account to speak for him, and does not correct the record, it can be considered primary source information. (... it's pretty clear, however, that most of the time Trump is in charge of Trump's Twitter account)
- Fjolsvith 6y agoThis is almost hilarious. Half of everything on Twitter is disputed now, hadn't you heard?
- shadowgovt 6y agoFine. Don't take the word of the President regarding who was on the President's "truly great team." The National Archives will log it as his words, as per their mandate to collect the writings of the President in his official capacity, but you don't have to believe them. Then when we evaluate her claims, we still find them to be utterly baseless accusations, detached from demonstrable fact. The court cases are being thrown out consistently, and the hearings in front of state legislatures have been downright embarrassing.
- Fjolsvith 6y agoI hear Gina H. is singing like a bird. After she was arrested, red-handed, during the raid. That's got to have some people really worried. And as far as citing mainstream media goes, that's now like quoting CCP press releases, i.e. party propaganda.
- shadowgovt 6y agoHeard from whom? Has the story been independently confirmed? https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cia-director-gina-haspel-ar/fact-checkcia-director-gina-haspel-was-not-arrested-injured-or-found-dead-idUSKBN28E215 https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cia-director-gi... Friendly reminder that Reuters is a UK news agency and has nothing in particular to gain from lying about this sort of thing (and everything to lose, since news agencies trade on credibility). but I'm sure QAnon already assumes they're part of the conspiracy. It has to. It is the nature of the conspiracy theory to address contradictions of fact by growing the conspiracy without bound until it encompasses everyone except the "true believers," who know what's "really going on." Somehow, it sadly never occurs to them that it is far more likely that the world is in fact round than a multi-decade multi-nation conspiracy is keeping a flat Earth secret.