3 ms·

Yeah, we have a view like that.

• comex 6y ago
  Out of curiosity, do you have an example of what it looks like? (I checked several patches on https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev/patches https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev/patches but couldn't find anything with line-by-line discussion.)
  • ddevault 6y ago
    Here's a simple example: https://lists.sr.ht/~emersion/mrsh-dev/patches/3449 https://lists.sr.ht/~emersion/mrsh-dev/patches/3449
    • hvis 6y ago
      Thanks for the reply. It's more than I expected (even if the UI and the lack of interactivity inside the browser are still a problem for me). Looking forward to experiencing it in practice someday. Maybe Emacs will finally migrate off Debbugs.
      • ddevault 6y ago
        You should go ask them! There's an ongoing discussion about it on the mailing list right now.
        • hvis 6y ago
          I'm on the mailing list ;-) The issue is brought up repeatedly, but there's no real movement right this moment (or for the last several months, really). There are several proponents of SourceHut thanks to its email-based workflows and (apparently?) LibreJS compatibility. But none are passionate enough to push for it, thus far, and do the work required. As opposed to, say, advocates of Gitlab (which got effectively banned by a long list of requirements, alas).