4 ms·
Agreed, it's a neat little app but having URL parameters work like this is very anti-user.
by Orou 6y ago
Agreed, it's a neat little app but having URL parameters work like this is very anti-user.
- neolog 6y agoDisagree. The app's url scheme is stateless, which is great. Linear views of browser history is the problem.
- javawizard 6y agoThe problem is not so much that it stores state in the URL as that it uses window.history.pushState instead of window.history.replaceState.
- quickthrower2 6y agoDo we really want to push the Git way of thinking onto joe-average web user.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Orou 6y agoHow something functions is more important that how it is implemented. I'll take a stateful app that doesn't break history over a stateless app that does any day of the week.