It's not trivial because, as this is what the article is all about: "That’s what made it so jarring to see an ACLU lawyer — indeed, the group’s most celebrated

It's not trivial because, as this is what the article is all about: "That’s what made it so jarring to see an ACLU lawyer — indeed, the group’s most celebrated and popular lawyer — cheering the corporate and cultural repression of a book whose ideas he dislikes." It's a bit like someone on the board of the Free Software Foundation advocating for people to not install Linux anymore because they don't like how Linux doesn't work properly on their Mac! --- Now an argument to say it was trivial would be: 1) its a deleted tweet 2) tweet was mainly a joke 3) tweets dont represent ACLU, its fear mongering 4) tweet based journalism is problematic