5 ms·
This may well be true, but I also don't generally store 100MB files in my (free ~3GB) Dropbox account. So, while it might not work for all needs, it seems to ac
by nantes 15y ago
This may well be true, but I also don't generally store 100MB files in my (free ~3GB) Dropbox account. So, while it might not work for all needs, it seems to actually meet my Dropbox usage pretty well.
- bravura 15y agoI use Dropbox to store my media (photos, videos, and music). I love it. Each time I have a new laptop, I know that all my media will be intact, and I don't need to invest any time to migrate it. Media storage is, I believe, a common Dropbox use case. And Dropbox's transparent uploads, which seem to automatically detect and throttle when I am using bandwidth, are a great feature that I haven't seen in any open-source competitor.
- nantes 15y agoI think one of the reasons I have never considered using Dropbox for media storage is that, given three teenage daughters, I don't think I could afford a big enough Dropbox account to store all of the media we consume and generate. Also, one of my favorite applications of Dropbox is having all of our important documents in one central location (whether this is a wise move or not... ). This makes accessing documents on the fly from my iPhone a breeze. Having media files in there as well, would, I think destroy my antique iPhone 3G! You are right on the money about the background uploading though.