3 ms·
In short, it's a matter of attitude. No, you're not obligated to respond to bug reports, but bug reports do provide value to your project, and not acknowledgin
by underdeserver 6y ago
In short, it's a matter of attitude.
No, you're not obligated to respond to bug reports, but bug reports do provide value to your project, and not acknowledging that value is just as rude as their expectation that you fix it.
The correct way to address this is an auto responder that says "Thank you for the bug report - we appreciate it; however, as this is a volunteer project, we do not guarantee
a response, timely or otherwise. If you have a commercial, pressing need for this bug to be solved, we suggest filing a paid support ticket here: <link>."
An important point is that reviewing a PR is also a time-consuming effort, the only difference is that it requires time on the submitter's part as well; I would be wary of recommending submitting a PR without talking to me first, since I may not have time to review it either, and then you've just wasted your time.
- freedomben 6y agoI completely agree. I've had to turn away PRs that came out of the blue and went a direction I didn't want to take. It sucks when that happens. But when it does, I thank the person and explain the decision. It's not what they want to hear, but it's a lot more respectful of their effort than silence or writing a blog post about how annoying they are.