4 ms·

Hey thanks for the input. I haven't tried that approach yet, but I'll consider it for future endeavours. So far I'm quite happy with the SaaS approach as I'm a

by amzans 6y ago

Hey thanks for the input. I haven't tried that approach yet, but I'll consider it for future endeavours. So far I'm quite happy with the SaaS approach as I'm able to prioritize my effort on improving the product for customers who support it via paid plans. As a one-man team it's important to reduce operational efforts. I like very much the idea of having monthly subscriptions with predictable cash flows. Let's see how it goes.

webmaven 6y ago
> So far I'm quite happy with the SaaS approach as I'm able to prioritize my effort on improving the product for customers who support it via paid plans. Note: the two approaches aren't mutually exclusive. You may even find that the folks who prefer to self-host the open-source version are leads to even more lucrative on-prem enterprise plans. The hard part to think about is segmentation of features between the open-source/free tier and the paid plan/enterprise versions. Of course, this is all becomes dramatically easier if you decide there is no difference feature-wise, and the differentiation is solely in volume of use and level of support.