4 ms·
> This has happened in all the lawsuits so far, I believe? You're being gaslit about that too, although yes, some motions were denied and some lawsuits were re
by m0zg 6y ago
> This has happened in all the lawsuits so far, I believe?
You're being gaslit about that too, although yes, some motions were denied and some lawsuits were rejected outright. Watch the last link in my original post. It explains the propaganda barrage perfectly.
There are a bunch of deadlines and appellate levels baked into this process for a reason. If Al Gore could hold things up for over a month over a few hundred votes, all the concerns about following lawful process are null and void. Same with histrionics about "overturning democracy".
The choice is pretty simple even to Trump voters: either Trump finds the smoking gun and deservedly gets a second term, or he's full of shit and he doesn't deserve a second term. Nobody on the right will set cities on fire either way.
- pjc50 6y agoNo videos, give me some text reporting. Which lawsuits have (a) submitted evidence and (b) not had it thrown out?
- m0zg 6y agohttps://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/ https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/ Literally 10 seconds in DuckDuckGo. Notice that where lawsuits are rejected they are mostly rejected over lack of standing, and will be re-filed elsewhere with stronger evidence, or dropped outright due to insufficient evidence. This is what the legal system is for - to establish the veracity of claims, and obtain relief when due. Still more lawsuits will be filed next week. The current crop are just the small fry ones that could be filed quickly. None of this constitutes "overturning democracy" in any shape or form. I do recommend that you watch the video though.
- augustt 6y agoAt the rate law firms are dropping Trump, those cases next week will have to be argued by Rudy himself. And god willing, he'll give us some more press conferences as a bonus.