The article tackles and refutes this pure field view, but continuous manifolds are no issue, and is required for anything to be extended in space--the transcend

The article tackles and refutes this pure field view, but continuous manifolds are no issue, and is required for anything to be extended in space--the transcendental aesthetic refutes the type of discursive space you're presuming, such as that of Leibniz. Or to quote yourself: "Anytime someone insists on HN that virtual particles are real, you can just tell them that Arkani-Hamed disagrees with you and that he is also smarter than you."