9 ms·
Do you have any evidence of this? From the article that seems like it violates their entire purpose for existing.
by seibelj 6y ago
Do you have any evidence of this? From the article that seems like it violates their entire purpose for existing.
- echelon 6y agoUpdated my post with a link. I'll find more.
- seibelj 6y agoWow that’s dumb if true, why even bother!?
- klyrs 6y agoIndeed, indeed. If it's not about the principled and unflinching protection of free speech, then what is it about? I've said it about twitter and I'll say it about parler. Freedom of association is also a first amendment right. Speech is being exercised by the owners of a platform when they edit/curate/annotate posts, and association is being exercised when they ban/shadowban users.
- loopz 6y agoIt's all about justifications for being egotistical assholes and believing feelings are enough justification for policy. You can't reason with people who dismiss facts, empathy and consequences. You can reach the middle ground on issues that affect livelihoods of people and try to map where this may be improved.