Great article, and I totally agree. I feel like some of the disagreement that others imply in their comments comes from a misunderstanding of what is telegraph

Great article, and I totally agree. I feel like some of the disagreement that others imply in their comments comes from a misunderstanding of what is telegraphed when someone writes their resume in this way. The actual metrics need context to be reliable, of course, but what is being telegraphed by someone that includes outcomes-related metrics on their resume? Contrast an answer to the above question by what is (and more importantly, is not) telegraphed by an "alternative" resume, more passive, more "used #{technology} to build #{feature}" Bikeshedding on the exact metrics, the truthiness of the statement, is missing the forest for the trees.