> hot hand fallacy at its finest. Interesting choice of analogy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_hand#Recent_research_in_support_of_hot_hand https://en.wikip

> hot hand fallacy at its finest. Interesting choice of analogy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_hand#Recent_research_in_support_of_hot_hand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_hand#Recent_research_in_su... Hot hand "fallacy" is only fallacious if cross-event outcomes are unrelated. Back in reality, neither hot hand nor reverse gambler's are actually fallacious.