4 ms·
Historically, hasn't monetary success gone to people who inherited the wealth? Monarchs and aristocrats and the like
by 8note 6y ago
Historically, hasn't monetary success gone to people who inherited the wealth?
Monarchs and aristocrats and the like
- barry-cotter 6y agoWhat historical period are you interested in? Because the aristocracy and monarchs of Europe are not doing great compared to 1915 and they’re doing a lot better than the nobility of any other continent. There have always been the ways to be rich, make it, take it or inherit it. Take it is no longer common in the developed world. For the super rich the top ten of the Forbes Billionaires List has three Waltons. The rest either made their own enormous fortune (6) or grew it out of all recognition.
- ffggvv 6y agothe richest people in the world list is filled with bill gates, bezos, zuckerberg... none of which inherited it
- read_if_gay_ 6y agoMost wealthy families actually lose their wealth within two generations.
- mettamage 6y agoI seriously the generalizability of your claim. I used to think the same way, until I saw articles like this about Florence (Italy): https://qz.com/694340/the-richest-families-in-florence-in-1427-are-still-the-richest-families-in-florence/ https://qz.com/694340/the-richest-families-in-florence-in-14...
- read_if_gay_ 6y agoIt’s true there are outliers, and especially so at the very top, but the general trend is pretty strong. 80% of American millionaires are first-generation. Pointing at the 0.0001% says very little.
- burntoutfire 6y agoPerhaps the problem is the cutoff? A million dollars is not "wealth", not anymore. It's just 2-3 houses in a big city or half a house in SV.