3 ms·
I doubt it was about saving their pennies. Zen1 EPYC was a huge package with an expensive assembly & copious silicon area. But it was spread across 32 cores. A
by ip26 6y ago
I doubt it was about saving their pennies. Zen1 EPYC was a huge package with an expensive assembly & copious silicon area. But it was spread across 32 cores. A larger BTB probably had to come at the expense of something else.
What 'real software' are you thinking of? Anything in particular? Just curious, not looking to argue.
(sorry I changed my comment around the same time you replied)
- jeffbee 6y agoVery large, branchy programs with very short basic blocks. This describes all the major workloads at Google, according to their paper at https://research.google/pubs/pub48320/ https://research.google/pubs/pub48320/