in this particular case, it'd be great if there was a recognizable thesis and supporting points backed up by discernable research (even cursory). i'm not sugge

in this particular case, it'd be great if there was a recognizable thesis and supporting points backed up by discernable research (even cursory). i'm not suggesting he's a crank, but that adoration should be tempered. we humans tend to get wrapped up in popularity rather than substance. the evaluation of analytical stances should be heavily tilted toward substance.