> This has come up again because a terrorist attacked the center of the capital Vienna. No. Please read the article. This is about a law suit which has been g

> This has come up again because a terrorist attacked the center of the capital Vienna. No. Please read the article. This is about a law suit which has been going on for a few years. The case itself has absolutely nothing to do with recent events. Also, Austria does not have a case law system. Courts don't make laws (the constitutional court in Austria can strike down laws, but that's about it) and are not bound by previous court decisions. The fact that the supreme court ruled on it just means the decision on this case is final (as far as the Austria judicial branch is concerned). Besides, do you seriously believe a court could act based on something that happened 11 days ago? Have you ever dealt with a court? That said, I mostly agree with your ramblings, but that has simply little to no connection to the case and resulting problems discussed in the article.