8 ms·
True superresolution is impossible, but a heck of a lot of resolution is hidden in video, without resorting to guesses and hallucination. Tiny camera shakes on
by jacobush 6y ago
True superresolution is impossible, but a heck of a lot of resolution is hidden in video, without resorting to guesses and hallucination.
Tiny camera shakes on a static scene gives away more information about that scene, it's effectively multisampling of the static scene. (If I have to hunch it, any regular video can "easily" be upscaled 50% without resorting to interpolation or hallucination.)
Our wetware image processing does the same - look at a movie shot at the regular 24fps where people walk around. Their faces look normal. But pause any given frame, and it's likely a blur. (But our wetware image processing likely does hallucination too, so it's maybe not a fair comparison.)
- Nullabillity 6y agoTemporal interpolation is still interpolation.
- randallsquared 6y agoAre you objecting to the premise that the scene is static?
- rowanG077 6y agoIt's not temporal interpolation. It's using data from different frame(s) to fill in the current frame. It's not interpolation at all. It's using a different accurate data source to augment another.