> This incident seems to be a mark in the column of the old argument that authoritarianism is bad for economic growth because of the ever-present potential for

> This incident seems to be a mark in the column of the old argument that authoritarianism is bad for economic growth because of the ever-present potential for capricious action such as this. As always predictability is essential: Measured and consistent regulations can be accounted for, capricious 'regulations' cannot be.