3 ms·
I think the largest part of the fact that many mechanics drive inexpensive, late-model cars and get rid of them is the fact that inexpensive, late-model cars ar
by bartonfink 15y ago
I think the largest part of the fact that many mechanics drive inexpensive, late-model cars and get rid of them is the fact that inexpensive, late-model cars are more or less irreparable in a hobby setting. Things simply aren't mechanical anymore. Modern cars are so computerized and interconnected that you often can't just "fix" a broken part, you have to replace it.
I'm sure a mechanic would be able to do the replacement if they had the part, but I imagine that takes a lot of the enjoyment out of being a mechanic. You could probably get around that by only buying cars that predate mass computerization (now 20+ years old), but then you're trading one problem for a potentially much larger set of problems. It's not that they might not want to fix cars - it's that it might not be worth it to indulge that activity as a hobby.
- georgieporgie 15y agoI don't really buy the idea that modern cars cannot be repaired by an independent or shade-tree mechanic. Sure, engine electronics are more tightly integrated, and may be engineered to 'require' an expensive tester, but there are still loads of things that a mechanic can do. Pulling transmissions, replacing clutches, timing belts, steering pumps, CV joints, oxygen sensors, etc. I waste time fixing a 30 year old vehicle because it's a fun pastime for me. They don't do it because it's just more of what they do all day.