3 ms·
>you're trying to elevate some flaky security feature to a debate about human rights. It is not a "flaky security feature" It is a main thing that defines who
by lovelyviking 6y ago
>you're trying to elevate some flaky security feature to a debate about human rights.
It is not a "flaky security feature" It is a main thing that defines who controls the personal computer.
Accessing and controlling Personal Computer with personal notes is the same as accessing and controlling personal notes written on paper.
There is no elevation here from my side, it is literally about human right for privacy and I am not the one who tried to elevate the issue to unrelated areas like cars and houses.
- pvg 6y agoIt is a main thing that defines who controls the personal computer It's a flaky feature that people had a workaround for in minutes. Nobody lost control of their computer. There is no elevation here from my side, it is literally about human right My secondary school had a bigass Universal Declaration of Human Rights mounted on a wall behind plexiglass. Whenever I got detention I'd protest citing Article 9. At 12, this seemed both funny and trenchant commentary on my predicament.