I don’t understand this comment. The syntax provider can be written in any language, and is basically just an abstraction for IDE behavior. Given that the instr

I don’t understand this comment. The syntax provider can be written in any language, and is basically just an abstraction for IDE behavior. Given that the instructions for how the IDE should represent any given code block, user behavior, or reactiveness in the IDE are defined by the language provider, what exactly is lacking for any arbitrary language? The only thing I can think of is that a given language may not have suitable representation in the IDE, eg a data-flow visual language when most of the IDEs features are centered around text.