4 ms·
AI passed human intelligence many times already. We just keep re-defining the problem to avoid that.
by blamestross 6y ago
AI passed human intelligence many times already. We just keep re-defining the problem to avoid that.
- jlbnjmn 6y agoRedefining problems is good when flaws in the original definitions are found. AI has perhaps, maybe passed human intelligence in 0.005% of applications. It's 2020 and we still have steering wheels in cars. If we replaced the word "AI" with "statistics" we'd be a lot closer to describing where we are.
- animal_spirits 6y ago"Statistically driven vehicles" sounds more correct, but less marketable
- superfrank 6y agoMaybe I'm reading way too much into it, but when I read things like "AI will achieve human-level intelligence" I assume they mean that the AI will be fairly general purpose. Most of the applications I've seen, while impressive, have been pretty narrow.