3 ms·
Yeah, to hell with you, Greenpeace, for trying to do good. Serves you right, you little goody two-shoes, for not having all the relevant data to make an informe
by esarbe 6y ago
Yeah, to hell with you, Greenpeace, for trying to do good. Serves you right, you little goody two-shoes, for not having all the relevant data to make an informed decision, losers.
Then again...
Maybe we should rather look at Exxon, BP et al. that already in the 70ies knew perfectly well about the possibility of antropogenic climate change and the danger that this might pose. They could have told Greenpeace. Instead they buried the research and chose to do everything to torpedo any political action.
But yeah, let's blame Greenpeace.
- andbberger 6y agoGreenpeace is _still_ vehemently anti-nuclear in 2020, and the data has been in for quite some time, so. But yes, Big Oil is also culpable.
- esarbe 6y agoYes. That's sadly true. It's difficult to change minds and it takes a lot of persistence. Since I also was very strongly anti-nuclear until the late 2010s, I have some idea on how to approach people in this regard, but it . takes . time.