4 ms·
Or you could ditch Arch and go with a workstation specific Linux distribution like Fedora or Pop_OS that works out of the box with a lot of hardware. Gnome is m
by amalantony06 6y ago
Or you could ditch Arch and go with a workstation specific Linux distribution like Fedora or Pop_OS that works out of the box with a lot of hardware. Gnome is more polished than the MacOS UI imho.
Been using Fedora for a few months now and I haven't had a sleepless night yet. Everything just works.
- hunterloftis 6y agoThe Linux desktop experience is sufficiently hardware-dependent to make single-sample distro comparisons useless. As a counter-example, I recently installed Manjaro (Arch-based) over Pop OS because Pop was slow and buggy on my relatively high-end system. Aggregate data can at least give a sense of how likely a given distro is to provide a smooth experience: https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=popularity https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=popularity
- ramtatatam 6y agoI always loved arch for its minimalistic approach. Well, maybe this is not entirely true since when we was pretty much forced to switch to systemd :) but it is still my favourite distro, even after those sleepless nights. I am maybe a weirdo but I don't regret a minute spent fixing my installation :)