3 ms·
It is also possible that there is nothing wrong with the financials, but there is wrong with the controls over the financials. IE, can the entire finance depar
by sithlord 6y ago
It is also possible that there is nothing wrong with the financials, but there is wrong with the controls over the financials.
IE, can the entire finance department sign off on checks? Or something along those lines.
But with the above example, say anyone can process process orders without any oversight (ie no sign off by 2 VPs or something like that) What is potentially stopping some AP clerk from setting up a fake company, and then paying them for services every month?
These are also the types of things that controls over financial reporting could mean.
- jgalt212 6y ago> It is also possible that there is nothing wrong with the financials, but there is wrong with the controls over the financials. Is it possible to have one without the other?
- cosmie 6y agoYes. It's like finding a security vulnerability without any evidence it was exploited. Just because an AP clerk could embezzle money that way, doesn't mean that they've identified evidence of that happening. But now they've reported that lapse in financial controls (which may or may not have been addressed), and warned that there may be others.