4 ms·
I promise you, emacs FTW in certain things which is why I persist with it (I'm a pragmatist not a masochist). VS certainly in others. They complement, but if I
by throwaway_pdp09 6y ago
I promise you, emacs FTW in certain things which is why I persist with it (I'm a pragmatist not a masochist). VS certainly in others. They complement, but if I could have VS's features in emacs, I wouldn't leave it.
- IggleSniggle 6y agoJust FYI I assumed you were taking about Visual Studio, not VSCode (a very different product), when you said VS. Every now and then I see emacs features that I wish existed in VSCode, and often I feel like VSCode extensions are reinventing the wheel but less well and more expensively...and yet, I’ve mostly given up and just use VSCode, because what it does right is make it relatively easy for anybody to write whatever feature they might want to exist, for the most part in whatever language with a small adapter to JavaScript, and package it as an extension.
- throwaway_pdp09 6y agoRight, I'll check out the difference Visual Studio vs VSCode. Didn't know, thanks.