6 ms·

Just to quickly help the Streisand effect, this is the private key, extracted from [1]: -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- MIIEvQIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCBKcwggSjAgE

Just to quickly help the Streisand effect, this is the private key, extracted from [1]: -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- MIIEvQIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCBKcwggSjAgEAAoIBAQC10dxEGINZbF0nIoMtM8705Nqm6ZWdb72DqTdFJ+UzQIRIUS59lQkYLvdQp71767vz0dVlPTikHmiv dYHRc7Fo6JsmSUsGR3th+fU6d1Wt6cwpMTUXj/qODmubDK/ioVDW7wz9OFlSsCBvylOYp9v2+u/VXwACnBXNxCDezjx4RKcqMFT31WTxqU9OM9J86ChMOW4bFA41aLAJ ozB+02xis7OV175XdQ5vkVXM9ys6ZoRF/K6NXeHiwcZFtMKyphXAxqU7uGY2a16bC3TEG5/km6Jru3Wxy4nKlDyUjWISwH4llWjdSi99r2c1fSCXlMCrW0CHoznn+22l YCKtYe8JAgMBAAECggEAGOPDJvFCHd43PFG9qlTyylR/2CSWzigLRfhGsClfd24oDaxLVHav+YcIZRqpVkr1flGlyEeittjQ1OAdptoTGbzp7EpRQmlLqyRoHRpT+MxO Hf91+KVFk+fGdEG+3CPgKKQt34Y0uByTPCpy2i10b7F3Xnq0Sicq1vG33DhYT9A/DRIjYr8Y0AVovq0VDjWqA1FW5OO9p7vky6e+PDMjSHucQ+uaLzVZSc7vWOh0tH5M 0GVk17YpBiB/iTpw4zBUIcaneQX3eaIfSCDHK0SCD6IRF7kl+uORzvWqiWlGzpdG2B96uyP4hd3WoPcZntM79PKm4dAotdgmalbueFJfpwKBgQDUy0EyA9Fq0aPF4LID HqDPduIm4hEAZf6sQLd8Fe6ywM4p9KOEVx7YPaFxQHFSgIiWXswildPJl8Cg5cM2EyMU1tdn5xaR4VIDk8e2JEDfhPtaWskpJp2rU2wHvAXOeAES7UFMrkhKVqqVOdbo IhlLdcYp5KxiJ3mwINSSO94ShwKBgQDavJvF+c8AINfCaMocUX0knXz+xCwdP430GoPQCHa1rUj5bZ3qn3XMwSWa57J4x3pVhYmgJv4jpEK+LBULFezNLV5N4C7vH63a Zo4OF7IUedFBS5B508yAq7RiPhN2VOC8LRdDh5oqnFufjafF82y9d+/czCrVIG43D+KO2j4F7wKBgDg/HZWF0tYEYeDNGuCeOO19xBt5B/tt+lo3pQhkl7qiIhyO8KXr jVilOcZAvXOMTA5LMnQ13ExeE2m0MdxaRJyeiUOKnrmisFYHuvNXM9qhQPtKIgABmA2QOG728SX5LHd/RRJqwur7a42UQ00Krlr235F1Q2eSfaTjmKyqrHGDAoGAOTrd 2ueoZFUzfnciYlRj1L+r45B6JlDpmDOTx0tfm9sx26j1h1yfWqoyZ5w1kupGNLgSsSdimPqyR8WK3/KlmW1EXkXIoeH8/8aTZlaGzlqtCFN4ApgKyqOiN44cU3qTrkhx 7MY+7OUqB83tVpqBGfWWeYOltUud6qQqV8v8LFsCgYEAnOq+Ls83CaHIWCjpVfiWC+R7mqW+ql1OGtoaajtA4AzhXzX8HIXpYjupPBlXlQ1FFfPem6jwa1UTZf8CpIb8 pPULAN9ZRrxG8V+bvkZWVREPTZj7xPCwPaZHNKoAmi3Dbv7S5SEYDbBX/NyPCLE4sj/AgTPbUsUtaiw5TvrPsFE= -----END PRIVATE KEY----- [1] https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/content/?origin_url=https://github.com/tomer8007/widevine-l3-decryptor&path=content_key_decryption.js https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/content/?...

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
eecc 6y ago
What would Google do if I emailed it to my own gmail account? Delete the email? Ban me?
- scott31 6y ago
  I emailed you the key, please report if you are banned so we can all learn the answer
  - qwertox 6y ago
    "As per our phone conversation, ..."
- pas 6y ago
  Sure, why not both? They deleted/locked accounts for less during the G+ real name frenzy.
vmp 6y ago
If I made a facemask with that printed on it (as a QR code or whatever) would google stop trying to identify my face? Or would that paint a huge red target on my face?
- justinclift 6y ago
  Probably a good idea to also incorporate that into some very-clearly-satire related artwork on the mask, to help with the legality. :)
- jlgaddis 6y ago
  Some HN'ers might be too young to remember the DeCSS [0] saga and, in particular, the t-shirts. The EFF, who successfully represented two defendants accused of publishing the DeCSS source code in the two main cases, has the details [1]: > In Bunner, the [ DVD Copy Control Association ] summarily dismissed its claims after the California Supreme Court ruled that computer programs could be preliminarily restrained from publication only in very narrow circumstances. The California Court of Appeals ruled that those circumstances were not met in Mr. Bunner's case because the program was not a trade secret at the time it was published, but instead was widely available around the world. > In Pavlovich, the California Supreme Court ruled that Matthew Pavlovich, a Texas resident who published DeCSS on the Internet, could not be forced to stand trial in California. The landmark decision laid out clear jurisdiction rules for claims arising from publishing information on the Internet. DVD CCA's attempt to seek U.S. Supreme Court review of the decision was also rejected. Additionally, the one known author of DeCSS was acquitted in a criminal trial in Norway. Obligatory EFF donation link: https://supporters.eff.org/donate/ https://supporters.eff.org/donate/ -- [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS [1]: https://www.eff.org/cases/dvdcca-v-bunner-and-dvdcca-v-pavlovich https://www.eff.org/cases/dvdcca-v-bunner-and-dvdcca-v-pavlo... -- EDIT: See also "AACS encryption key controversy" and the "free speech flag": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controvers...
qwerty456127 6y ago
I can hardly understand the motivation of the corporations keeping to invest in DRM and software activation bullshit tech despite it's obvious it is going to be cracked inevitably (and quickly).
- seirl 6y ago
  The goal of DRM is and always have been to lock users inside a platform, not to prevent piracy. It gives companies market power because users cannot easily switch to a better alternative without losing their entire digital collection. https://www.defectivebydesign.org/faq#copyright https://www.defectivebydesign.org/faq#copyright > DRM is not about limiting copyright infringement. Such an argument attempts to make DRM appear beneficial to authors and is based entirely on a (very successfully advertised) misrepresentation of DRM's purpose. To illustrate the absurdity of the argument, consider the nature of file sharing: to obtain a copy of a file without permission, downloaders go to a friend or a file sharing network, not a DRM-encumbered distribution platform. If DRM existed only to prevent unauthorized sharing, every distribution method for that particular piece of media would have to be distributed by an uncrackable DRM-encumbered distribution platform, which is impossible on its own. So long as one copy becomes available without DRM, countless more are easily produced. Industry proponents of DRM are well aware that DRM is not a copyright enforcement mechanism. DRM is only marketed as a copyright enforcement mechanism to mislead authors into tolerating and even defending it.
  - autoexec 6y ago
    > The goal of DRM is and always have been to lock users inside a platform, In that case it fails to accomplish that goal for the same reason. It doesn't work and will be defeated. When you download a song, or movie, or ebook that has been stripped of its DRM you aren't tied to anything. Why introduce unnecessary annoyances for paying customers which often drives them to pirate copies that aren't crippled by DRM? As long as something works like they want it to, most people wont care what platform they use to get it.
    - qwerty456127 6y ago
djxfade 6y ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20201113115225/https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25078096 https://web.archive.org/web/20201113115225/https://news.ycom...
jeffrallen 6y ago
It is also here: https://pastebin.com/0U14ahpm https://pastebin.com/0U14ahpm
jlgaddis 6y ago
Geez, man! At least format it correctly so folks can copy and paste! :-) -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- MIIEvQIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCBKcwggSjAgEAAoIBAQC10dxEGINZbF0nIoMtM870 5Nqm6ZWdb72DqTdFJ+UzQIRIUS59lQkYLvdQp71767vz0dVlPTikHmivdYHRc7Fo6JsmSUsG R3th+fU6d1Wt6cwpMTUXj/qODmubDK/ioVDW7wz9OFlSsCBvylOYp9v2+u/VXwACnBXNxCDe zjx4RKcqMFT31WTxqU9OM9J86ChMOW4bFA41aLAJozB+02xis7OV175XdQ5vkVXM9ys6ZoRF /K6NXeHiwcZFtMKyphXAxqU7uGY2a16bC3TEG5/km6Jru3Wxy4nKlDyUjWISwH4llWjdSi99 r2c1fSCXlMCrW0CHoznn+22lYCKtYe8JAgMBAAECggEAGOPDJvFCHd43PFG9qlTyylR/2CSW zigLRfhGsClfd24oDaxLVHav+YcIZRqpVkr1flGlyEeittjQ1OAdptoTGbzp7EpRQmlLqyRo HRpT+MxOHf91+KVFk+fGdEG+3CPgKKQt34Y0uByTPCpy2i10b7F3Xnq0Sicq1vG33DhYT9A/ DRIjYr8Y0AVovq0VDjWqA1FW5OO9p7vky6e+PDMjSHucQ+uaLzVZSc7vWOh0tH5M0GVk17Yp BiB/iTpw4zBUIcaneQX3eaIfSCDHK0SCD6IRF7kl+uORzvWqiWlGzpdG2B96uyP4hd3WoPcZ ntM79PKm4dAotdgmalbueFJfpwKBgQDUy0EyA9Fq0aPF4LIDHqDPduIm4hEAZf6sQLd8Fe6y wM4p9KOEVx7YPaFxQHFSgIiWXswildPJl8Cg5cM2EyMU1tdn5xaR4VIDk8e2JEDfhPtaWskp Jp2rU2wHvAXOeAES7UFMrkhKVqqVOdboIhlLdcYp5KxiJ3mwINSSO94ShwKBgQDavJvF+c8A INfCaMocUX0knXz+xCwdP430GoPQCHa1rUj5bZ3qn3XMwSWa57J4x3pVhYmgJv4jpEK+LBUL FezNLV5N4C7vH63aZo4OF7IUedFBS5B508yAq7RiPhN2VOC8LRdDh5oqnFufjafF82y9d+/c zCrVIG43D+KO2j4F7wKBgDg/HZWF0tYEYeDNGuCeOO19xBt5B/tt+lo3pQhkl7qiIhyO8KXr jVilOcZAvXOMTA5LMnQ13ExeE2m0MdxaRJyeiUOKnrmisFYHuvNXM9qhQPtKIgABmA2QOG72 8SX5LHd/RRJqwur7a42UQ00Krlr235F1Q2eSfaTjmKyqrHGDAoGAOTrd2ueoZFUzfnciYlRj 1L+r45B6JlDpmDOTx0tfm9sx26j1h1yfWqoyZ5w1kupGNLgSsSdimPqyR8WK3/KlmW1EXkXI oeH8/8aTZlaGzlqtCFN4ApgKyqOiN44cU3qTrkhx7MY+7OUqB83tVpqBGfWWeYOltUud6qQq V8v8LFsCgYEAnOq+Ls83CaHIWCjpVfiWC+R7mqW+ql1OGtoaajtA4AzhXzX8HIXpYjupPBlX lQ1FFfPem6jwa1UTZf8CpIb8pPULAN9ZRrxG8V+bvkZWVREPTZj7xPCwPaZHNKoAmi3Dbv7S 5SEYDbBX/NyPCLE4sj/AgTPbUsUtaiw5TvrPsFE= -----END PRIVATE KEY----- Or, just provide the various components: p = 49429002897777261000839566786960900348661596779839481928152034285352681641807686782292757653824830822496391192085567895071852258385592280527115222429444042313542936301974046594875899181233742229945549738766655661560628018266563543784515148821370566306893780280151659623161213410927305309695027848755504091783 q = 53602170802863928289500972217307025477290164757146419371852251620670300136901587204821451746991406880988053571342615187459978423766579984968561470104139545987787266751875098417999761783952366342302556060906681062460952347680147798276356366502237505269309185857430061068092584194979239221868593482021566547439 n = 2952619226006031733278005132921693726100042011592660779869675820212138145939883834312253789060663461194528411412874982355146048292836507534000115353036163880492136645451564382009196182566124637478277389304691251397819894417106558057773147299342857185830516918343274468842497499522414750028740163342718036209925403503207235945059541974923084211147227388348091101183403929204074586611952779802158116643840147678791643283706927948872797793849591629882391903699724329001797545580009544763555067611040895630150211640906898700482769873702547829023169433411394249565049633221004211830736052381384491512655254513796679593737 d = 142033101700003260678755863863267700134374886049156296238778043258513471417667391237505300342672722921505586813412391537592394712287451780540489111338082979901966887630936873112829448279475520471433931949082770983040743133849146064289054900225131501940560027662491217132619227565578893295128589581903273904124801461070363532834633728769178636552784294153467969250254358604276515140477045217505629092433114246051368410587618590542410950189868285511930901887132942539241081579465767831350539339965000260768249119651905050152151634478714116343168832447694793716937575319879226685046081583200335708696821445923072794535 e = 65537
jeroenhd 6y ago
WideVine has support for revoking private keys if they get leaked, which duped a bunch of smart TV customers before. I'm pretty sure the key is useless already, or will be very soon. Google can just roll new keys whenever the old ones get published through their Chrome update mechanisms.
- pantalaimon 6y ago
  See https://np.reddit.com/r/netflix/comments/jq9wdb/netflix_capped_at_166mbps480p/ https://np.reddit.com/r/netflix/comments/jq9wdb/netflix_capp...
swiley 6y ago
Wait why does it need a private key that's pushed to everyone's device? How does that actually secure anything? I skimmed the code but I'm still not seeing it.
- jagged-chisel 6y ago
  Technically: one must have the private key to perform decryption. There are many schemes that attempt to protect the original key and derive a decryption key, or do various other things to prevent disclosure of the private side of a key pair. Practically: the point is not to "secure" anything, but to make it obvious that any infringement is due to "circumventing a protection device." Circumvention is also not allowed under DMCA, because it was obvious to the authors of the law that to view content one must indeed decrypt it.
kaszanka 6y ago
It is also on factordb: http://factordb.com/index.php?query=22952619226006031733278005132921693726100042011592660779869675820212138145939883834312253789060663461194528411412874982355146048292836507534000115353036163880492136645451564382009196182566124637478277389304691251397819894417106558057773147299342857185830516918343274468842497499522414750028740163342718036209925403503207235945059541974923084211147227388348091101183403929204074586611952779802158116643840147678791643283706927948872797793849591629882391903699724329001797545580009544763555067611040895630150211640906898700482769873702547829023169433411394249565049633221004211830736052381384491512655254513796679593737 http://factordb.com/index.php?query=229526192260060317332780...

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

eecc 6y ago

What would Google do if I emailed it to my own gmail account? Delete the email? Ban me?

scott31 6y ago
I emailed you the key, please report if you are banned so we can all learn the answer
- qwertox 6y ago
  "As per our phone conversation, ..."
pas 6y ago
Sure, why not both? They deleted/locked accounts for less during the G+ real name frenzy.

vmp 6y ago

If I made a facemask with that printed on it (as a QR code or whatever) would google stop trying to identify my face? Or would that paint a huge red target on my face?

justinclift 6y ago
Probably a good idea to also incorporate that into some very-clearly-satire related artwork on the mask, to help with the legality. :)
jlgaddis 6y ago
Some HN'ers might be too young to remember the DeCSS [0] saga and, in particular, the t-shirts. The EFF, who successfully represented two defendants accused of publishing the DeCSS source code in the two main cases, has the details [1]: > In Bunner, the [ DVD Copy Control Association ] summarily dismissed its claims after the California Supreme Court ruled that computer programs could be preliminarily restrained from publication only in very narrow circumstances. The California Court of Appeals ruled that those circumstances were not met in Mr. Bunner's case because the program was not a trade secret at the time it was published, but instead was widely available around the world. > In Pavlovich, the California Supreme Court ruled that Matthew Pavlovich, a Texas resident who published DeCSS on the Internet, could not be forced to stand trial in California. The landmark decision laid out clear jurisdiction rules for claims arising from publishing information on the Internet. DVD CCA's attempt to seek U.S. Supreme Court review of the decision was also rejected. Additionally, the one known author of DeCSS was acquitted in a criminal trial in Norway. Obligatory EFF donation link: https://supporters.eff.org/donate/ https://supporters.eff.org/donate/ -- [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS [1]: https://www.eff.org/cases/dvdcca-v-bunner-and-dvdcca-v-pavlovich https://www.eff.org/cases/dvdcca-v-bunner-and-dvdcca-v-pavlo... -- EDIT: See also "AACS encryption key controversy" and the "free speech flag": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controvers...

qwerty456127 6y ago

I can hardly understand the motivation of the corporations keeping to invest in DRM and software activation bullshit tech despite it's obvious it is going to be cracked inevitably (and quickly).

seirl 6y ago
The goal of DRM is and always have been to lock users inside a platform, not to prevent piracy. It gives companies market power because users cannot easily switch to a better alternative without losing their entire digital collection. https://www.defectivebydesign.org/faq#copyright https://www.defectivebydesign.org/faq#copyright > DRM is not about limiting copyright infringement. Such an argument attempts to make DRM appear beneficial to authors and is based entirely on a (very successfully advertised) misrepresentation of DRM's purpose. To illustrate the absurdity of the argument, consider the nature of file sharing: to obtain a copy of a file without permission, downloaders go to a friend or a file sharing network, not a DRM-encumbered distribution platform. If DRM existed only to prevent unauthorized sharing, every distribution method for that particular piece of media would have to be distributed by an uncrackable DRM-encumbered distribution platform, which is impossible on its own. So long as one copy becomes available without DRM, countless more are easily produced. Industry proponents of DRM are well aware that DRM is not a copyright enforcement mechanism. DRM is only marketed as a copyright enforcement mechanism to mislead authors into tolerating and even defending it.
- autoexec 6y ago
  > The goal of DRM is and always have been to lock users inside a platform, In that case it fails to accomplish that goal for the same reason. It doesn't work and will be defeated. When you download a song, or movie, or ebook that has been stripped of its DRM you aren't tied to anything. Why introduce unnecessary annoyances for paying customers which often drives them to pirate copies that aren't crippled by DRM? As long as something works like they want it to, most people wont care what platform they use to get it.
  - qwerty456127 6y ago

djxfade 6y ago

https://web.archive.org/web/20201113115225/https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25078096 https://web.archive.org/web/20201113115225/https://news.ycom...

jeffrallen 6y ago

It is also here: https://pastebin.com/0U14ahpm https://pastebin.com/0U14ahpm

jlgaddis 6y ago

Geez, man! At least format it correctly so folks can copy and paste! :-) -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- MIIEvQIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCBKcwggSjAgEAAoIBAQC10dxEGINZbF0nIoMtM870 5Nqm6ZWdb72DqTdFJ+UzQIRIUS59lQkYLvdQp71767vz0dVlPTikHmivdYHRc7Fo6JsmSUsG R3th+fU6d1Wt6cwpMTUXj/qODmubDK/ioVDW7wz9OFlSsCBvylOYp9v2+u/VXwACnBXNxCDe zjx4RKcqMFT31WTxqU9OM9J86ChMOW4bFA41aLAJozB+02xis7OV175XdQ5vkVXM9ys6ZoRF /K6NXeHiwcZFtMKyphXAxqU7uGY2a16bC3TEG5/km6Jru3Wxy4nKlDyUjWISwH4llWjdSi99 r2c1fSCXlMCrW0CHoznn+22lYCKtYe8JAgMBAAECggEAGOPDJvFCHd43PFG9qlTyylR/2CSW zigLRfhGsClfd24oDaxLVHav+YcIZRqpVkr1flGlyEeittjQ1OAdptoTGbzp7EpRQmlLqyRo HRpT+MxOHf91+KVFk+fGdEG+3CPgKKQt34Y0uByTPCpy2i10b7F3Xnq0Sicq1vG33DhYT9A/ DRIjYr8Y0AVovq0VDjWqA1FW5OO9p7vky6e+PDMjSHucQ+uaLzVZSc7vWOh0tH5M0GVk17Yp BiB/iTpw4zBUIcaneQX3eaIfSCDHK0SCD6IRF7kl+uORzvWqiWlGzpdG2B96uyP4hd3WoPcZ ntM79PKm4dAotdgmalbueFJfpwKBgQDUy0EyA9Fq0aPF4LIDHqDPduIm4hEAZf6sQLd8Fe6y wM4p9KOEVx7YPaFxQHFSgIiWXswildPJl8Cg5cM2EyMU1tdn5xaR4VIDk8e2JEDfhPtaWskp Jp2rU2wHvAXOeAES7UFMrkhKVqqVOdboIhlLdcYp5KxiJ3mwINSSO94ShwKBgQDavJvF+c8A INfCaMocUX0knXz+xCwdP430GoPQCHa1rUj5bZ3qn3XMwSWa57J4x3pVhYmgJv4jpEK+LBUL FezNLV5N4C7vH63aZo4OF7IUedFBS5B508yAq7RiPhN2VOC8LRdDh5oqnFufjafF82y9d+/c zCrVIG43D+KO2j4F7wKBgDg/HZWF0tYEYeDNGuCeOO19xBt5B/tt+lo3pQhkl7qiIhyO8KXr jVilOcZAvXOMTA5LMnQ13ExeE2m0MdxaRJyeiUOKnrmisFYHuvNXM9qhQPtKIgABmA2QOG72 8SX5LHd/RRJqwur7a42UQ00Krlr235F1Q2eSfaTjmKyqrHGDAoGAOTrd2ueoZFUzfnciYlRj 1L+r45B6JlDpmDOTx0tfm9sx26j1h1yfWqoyZ5w1kupGNLgSsSdimPqyR8WK3/KlmW1EXkXI oeH8/8aTZlaGzlqtCFN4ApgKyqOiN44cU3qTrkhx7MY+7OUqB83tVpqBGfWWeYOltUud6qQq V8v8LFsCgYEAnOq+Ls83CaHIWCjpVfiWC+R7mqW+ql1OGtoaajtA4AzhXzX8HIXpYjupPBlX lQ1FFfPem6jwa1UTZf8CpIb8pPULAN9ZRrxG8V+bvkZWVREPTZj7xPCwPaZHNKoAmi3Dbv7S 5SEYDbBX/NyPCLE4sj/AgTPbUsUtaiw5TvrPsFE= -----END PRIVATE KEY----- Or, just provide the various components: p = 49429002897777261000839566786960900348661596779839481928152034285352681641807686782292757653824830822496391192085567895071852258385592280527115222429444042313542936301974046594875899181233742229945549738766655661560628018266563543784515148821370566306893780280151659623161213410927305309695027848755504091783 q = 53602170802863928289500972217307025477290164757146419371852251620670300136901587204821451746991406880988053571342615187459978423766579984968561470104139545987787266751875098417999761783952366342302556060906681062460952347680147798276356366502237505269309185857430061068092584194979239221868593482021566547439 n = 2952619226006031733278005132921693726100042011592660779869675820212138145939883834312253789060663461194528411412874982355146048292836507534000115353036163880492136645451564382009196182566124637478277389304691251397819894417106558057773147299342857185830516918343274468842497499522414750028740163342718036209925403503207235945059541974923084211147227388348091101183403929204074586611952779802158116643840147678791643283706927948872797793849591629882391903699724329001797545580009544763555067611040895630150211640906898700482769873702547829023169433411394249565049633221004211830736052381384491512655254513796679593737 d = 142033101700003260678755863863267700134374886049156296238778043258513471417667391237505300342672722921505586813412391537592394712287451780540489111338082979901966887630936873112829448279475520471433931949082770983040743133849146064289054900225131501940560027662491217132619227565578893295128589581903273904124801461070363532834633728769178636552784294153467969250254358604276515140477045217505629092433114246051368410587618590542410950189868285511930901887132942539241081579465767831350539339965000260768249119651905050152151634478714116343168832447694793716937575319879226685046081583200335708696821445923072794535 e = 65537

jeroenhd 6y ago

WideVine has support for revoking private keys if they get leaked, which duped a bunch of smart TV customers before. I'm pretty sure the key is useless already, or will be very soon. Google can just roll new keys whenever the old ones get published through their Chrome update mechanisms.

pantalaimon 6y ago
See https://np.reddit.com/r/netflix/comments/jq9wdb/netflix_capped_at_166mbps480p/ https://np.reddit.com/r/netflix/comments/jq9wdb/netflix_capp...

swiley 6y ago

Wait why does it need a private key that's pushed to everyone's device? How does that actually secure anything? I skimmed the code but I'm still not seeing it.

jagged-chisel 6y ago
Technically: one must have the private key to perform decryption. There are many schemes that attempt to protect the original key and derive a decryption key, or do various other things to prevent disclosure of the private side of a key pair. Practically: the point is not to "secure" anything, but to make it obvious that any infringement is due to "circumventing a protection device." Circumvention is also not allowed under DMCA, because it was obvious to the authors of the law that to view content one must indeed decrypt it.

kaszanka 6y ago

It is also on factordb: http://factordb.com/index.php?query=22952619226006031733278005132921693726100042011592660779869675820212138145939883834312253789060663461194528411412874982355146048292836507534000115353036163880492136645451564382009196182566124637478277389304691251397819894417106558057773147299342857185830516918343274468842497499522414750028740163342718036209925403503207235945059541974923084211147227388348091101183403929204074586611952779802158116643840147678791643283706927948872797793849591629882391903699724329001797545580009544763555067611040895630150211640906898700482769873702547829023169433411394249565049633221004211830736052381384491512655254513796679593737 http://factordb.com/index.php?query=229526192260060317332780...