> His company must follow the law. Of course. That being said, wasn't there a big discussion when this happened to youtube-dl about how that was almost certain

> His company must follow the law. Of course. That being said, wasn't there a big discussion when this happened to youtube-dl about how that was almost certainly not a legitimate DMCA? That being the case, disregarding it would not be illegal, at least to my (quite limited) understanding. It appears I misunderstood in this specific case as there is a much stronger case for this DMCA to be considered legitimate.