> “I’d put the heads on pikes. Right. I’d put them at the two corners of the White House as a warning to federal bureaucrats. You either get with the program or

> “I’d put the heads on pikes. Right. I’d put them at the two corners of the White House as a warning to federal bureaucrats. You either get with the program or you are gone,” Bannon said in the video. Zuckerberg's argument appears to be that Bannon didn't say the head-on-a-pike stuff enough to trigger suspension. What Zuckerberg isn't considering is Bannon's past. He's not just some sleazy media wannabe - he's a former staff member of the Executive Office of the President. Nor is this the only thing. Consider Charlotsville: https://www.newsweek.com/steve-bannon-support-trump-charlottesville-violence-1056590 https://www.newsweek.com/steve-bannon-support-trump-charlott... If a former high-ranking member of the president's staff calls for heads on pikes and and that's not enough to trigger suspension, I can only conclude that the process is more or less arbitrary, or completely borked.