4 ms·
Today, the 1950's era "Duck and Cover" drills [1] are sometimes laughed at. However, in the event of an actual nuclear blast, some simple preparation would save
by lwneal 6y ago
Today, the 1950's era "Duck and Cover" drills [1] are sometimes laughed at. However, in the event of an actual nuclear blast, some simple preparation would save lives. When a bright flash lights up the sky, people indoors will naturally run to the nearest window to see what happened. This is the wrong thing to do, because the bright flash of an explosion is followed a few seconds later by a pressure wave, turning the window glass into a fast-moving cloud of shrapnel.
Just getting under a desk or table away from any windows improves your chances of survival. The advice is useful even if the flash is not caused by a nuclear weapon. Most of the injuries from the Chelyabinsk meteor [2] in 2013 were caused by window shrapnel.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKqXu-5jw60&t=81s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKqXu-5jw60&t=81s
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelyabinsk_meteor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelyabinsk_meteor
- XorNot 6y agoWatching people react to city-level disasters like the ammonia nitrate explosion is why we should still be teaching this. There is way too much YouTube of camera phone footage being taken from right up against glass windows. If you see anything that looks like that, you absolutely should not be near a window.
- baybal2 6y agoI remember reading a Russia analogue of Twiter at the time, and it was just exploding with “You idiot, you've killed us all!” towards Putin.
- refurb 6y agoExactly. Duck and cover won't help much if you're out in the open less than a km from ground zero. But it will help a lot if you're 25 miles away from a several hundred kiloton blast and indoors.
- spurgu 6y agoAnd the Lebanon explosion more recently.