2 ms·
So the popular qualities of vi came into existence by accident... Joking aside, I could never be efficient in vi or vim because I need to edit simultaneously a
by hatmatrix 6y ago
So the popular qualities of vi came into existence by accident...
Joking aside, I could never be efficient in vi or vim because I need to edit simultaneously as I type. In vim, I'm slowed down by the fear "not to mess up", since I have to switch to normal mode to edit before switching back to editing mode and continue to type. Or, for instance, in languages without a function composition operator (or pipes), typing out nested functions in order of application (which is not left-to-right) requires A LOT of switching between editing and normal modes just to complete the thought.
I've never been able to figure out how others find this desirable.
- scns 6y agoIn Haskell you can use & (equivalent to OCamls |> operator) to compose the other way around. edit: s/corresponding/equivalent/g