I agree misunderstand each other. What are "all those things" that "are already standard"? And why should a rando government or other site requiring an API mea

I agree misunderstand each other. What are "all those things" that "are already standard"? And why should a rando government or other site requiring an API mean it should be available to all websites everywhere? Note, I didn't even mention javascript nor disabling it altogether, and I don't wish to imply we shouldn't secure any and all APIs/features. I'm saying (1) we will never secure all APIs/features; (2) they are ever growing so it would be futile even if we could secure the present ones; (3) even if all the APIs are "secure", they will be misused against users, so they should not be available by default like they currently are; (4) yes, I do think static/simple sites should be usable without JS. I used to think of Stallman's browsing habits as silly, but there may come a time where I will visit the web-at-large only from other people's or dedicated-use devices.