3 ms·
My dad was a programmer, so I don't know what it's like to grow up without a computer. Having a computer from such a young age set me up to be bored in school.
by roadtripgeek 18y ago
My dad was a programmer, so I don't know what it's like to grow up without a computer. Having a computer from such a young age set me up to be bored in school. Zork was a major influence in my initial interest in reading. By the time I hit kindergarten, I was already devouring the biographies written for kids. My teachers usually didn't know what to do with me, so I spent most of kindergarten - second grade on my own in the school library.
My grades have always been good, but I think that's more because of my parents' influence. My mom is a teacher and helped me find books on subjects that weren't offered in my school, so I would be less likely to hit material that I would be learning later in class. She also encouraged me to write.
My dad introduced me to programming and Pascal in elementary school. I went to a rural public high school in Louisiana, so my dad would often pick up old college textbooks in subjects my high school didn't offer, like chemistry, Latin, and history from a non Christian perspective. He also stood up for me when my guidance counselor tried to put me on the MRS. track instead of college. If I had to sit through 4 years of home ec and parenting classes, I would have dropped out as soon as I turned 16.
I think kids tend to do better in school when their parents care. An involved parent could use a computer to enhance their child's education. A non involved parent might use it as "tv 2.0" - just another thing to entertain their kid so they don't have to.
- rw 18y agoA deeper thing you're getting at is the irrelevancy of public grade school.
- Zev 18y agoPublic school isn't irrelevant. It just needs to be updated a bit. The gap between how the current generation (people born post 1980 or so) and people born before before that is huge. And now we're starting to get teachers who grew up in the 1980's and soon, the 90's. Having teachers that know how to relate to kids will do more to keep them interested then any change in the curriculum can do. Because, fundamentally, the curricula is solid - Math doesn't change that often, Physics/Chemistry/Biology/Earth Sciences are well established fields. History is ongoing, but given what High School history classes focus on, it's not going to change much. English/Literature isn't going to change an incredible amount - new books can be added in, but Shakespeare's words haven't changed since he wrote them. Writing styles may come and go, but thats just a small part of everything learned in HS.