4 ms·
But for someone else who knows GNU screen really well, the $10 could easily be worth the short amount of time it would take to provide an answer. I could see t
by rgarcia 15y ago
But for someone else who knows GNU screen really well, the $10 could easily be worth the short amount of time it would take to provide an answer.
I could see this being a good way to go deeper than the regular Q&A site format by offering monetary incentives to participate.
- biot 15y agoAnd questions which really are easy pickings will get 10 people answering them if the site becomes popular. So that $10 reward -- actually $7 after the 30% fee -- would have a 10% probability to win, assuming equal strength of answers for the really easy ones. I don't know many people who'd care about 70 cents.
- blake8086 15y agoIt sounds like 10 people would care about it in that example you gave.
- biot 15y agoThe first person responding perhaps thought it was easy money. Every subsequent answer is a race to the bottom. So why not go all the way and allow responders to underbid the last guy? That way, someone could spend an hour writing a very detailed response hoping to get the $7 and someone could come along, crib their answer off of the first one, and offer to accept only $6. The first guy, not wanting to totally waste the effort he put in, can then lower his bid to $5. Rinse and repeat.