4 ms·
> If you must know I was referring to contact tracing. I’m against it. I’m anti lockdown too. I get ostracized every time I bring it up. You should be. You are
by aplummer 6y ago
> If you must know I was referring to contact tracing. I’m against it. I’m anti lockdown too. I get ostracized every time I bring it up.
You should be. You are talking about millions of peoples lives here. The fallacies that create these opinions like the proven false economy vs health narrative are utterly misguided delusions.
- dkdk8283 6y agoI have the right to say and think as I want. Just like you. The difference is I won’t browbeat you for your opinion.
- fairity 6y agoYes, you have that right. And, the community has the right to downvote you to oblivion. It seems like you'd rather they not, so I'd recommend putting forth a well-structured argument to support your claims.
- dkdk8283 6y agoLet the downvotes pour. It’s the offline consequences that I have a problem with. In this case there aren’t any.
- ryanlol 6y agoOn the other we might as well view every year spent locked down as a year wasted. So with an average life expectancy of 80 years you’d be throwing away an entire lifetime for every 80 people you lock down. That’s a 1.23% death rate, it’s not yet clear that COVID is worse.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- nulld3v 6y agoThat's essentially equating being in lockdown to being temporarily dead, which in my opinion is an exaggeration.
- ryanlol 6y agoPerhaps it’s even worse than death? Dead people can’t really suffer. I’m sure lots of (most?) people would choose the “temporary death” option over being prisoners inside their homes, just fall asleep and wake up free.