3 ms·

Nothing from that twitter account is relevant on a site dedicated to increasing knowledge, as HN is.

• jungletime 6y ago
  If reposting Tumps (still your president) tweets is not allowed. Can I post the source behind his tweet. Its crazy to me that both "Let him present his evidence" and censoring when he does present his evidence, comes from the same side. I make no claims of validity, just relevance. https://noqreport.com/2020/11/11/data-deep-dive-on-dominion-voting-systems-offers-incontrovertible-proof-of-election-hack/ https://noqreport.com/2020/11/11/data-deep-dive-on-dominion-...
  • dragonwriter 6y ago
    > Can I post the source behind his tweet. Its clearly not relevant to this piece on the applicability of Benford's law. While I personally think its inappropriate for HN for a number of reasons, others might disagree and we have community moderation tools to resolve that disagreement, and it would at least be less inappropriate submitted as an independent story, rather than a comment on this one.
  • pwinnski 6y ago
    First paragraph, second sentence: "...as we examine the work of a dedicated Trump-supporter who appears to have uncovered all of the proof necessary to dispel this myth that Joe Biden won the presidential election." This is nothing but sound and fury, signifying nothing, and hiding being dispassionate "no claims" doesn't absolve you from posting obvious inflammatory garbage.