3 ms·
A lot of these are pixel-for-pixel duplicates. For example, the first one and the second.
by recursive 6y ago
A lot of these are pixel-for-pixel duplicates. For example, the first one and the second.
- b450 6y agoThe first is an isometric view of 3 cubes. The second is a star inscribed in a hexagon
- blacksmith_tb 6y agoHmm, maybe they render differently in different browsers? To me, 0, 2, 8, 20, 56, 68, and more all look exactly the same.
- quickthrower2 6y agoThey render differently in different visual cortices.
- fegu 6y agoClever joke :) not wrong.
- Groxx 6y agoPerhaps one is a pile of cubes in a corner on the floor, and the other is a pile of cubes in a corner on the ceiling?
- graderjs 6y agoThis guy gets it.
- mwcremer 6y agoTo be fair, it says "1000 auto-generated," not "1000 unique autogenerated." I imagine there is some procedural difference in how they are generated that just happens to result in the same visible arrangement.
- appleflaxen 6y ago204, 210, 222, 420, 432 are also the same as 0 and 2. it's a popular pattern in the collection.