4 ms·
That's remastered? They didn't bother touching the audio at all. Too bad.
by jtbayly 6y ago
That's remastered? They didn't bother touching the audio at all. Too bad.
- roywiggins 6y agoIt's a 4K scan of the original film, a substantial improvement over the extremely 1970s broadcast quality video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPuaSY0cMK8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPuaSY0cMK8
- Markoff 6y agowhy was the quality so low? even back in 70s broadcasts had better quality than this
- ddlatham 6y agoOne difference I noticed from my memory of watching it 20 years ago is in the original video there was a delay between the visual of the explosion and the audio, which makes sense because of the distance. In this version, they appear to have synced them up.
- phkahler 6y agoAnd I recall a distinctive red in a large portion of the stuff blasted upward. Did they remove the blood in the remaster?
- roywiggins 6y agoKATU's YouTube channel has the original-quality version also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPuaSY0cMK8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPuaSY0cMK8 The color balance is totally different. The remastered blast is not nearly so red, but then, neither is the entire rest of the video.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]