3 ms·
It's been a while since I touched either WinForms or WPF, but, if I recall correctly how things worked, I don't think this is actually an exception to the conve
by mumblemumble 6y ago
It's been a while since I touched either WinForms or WPF, but, if I recall correctly how things worked, I don't think this is actually an exception to the convention. Don't they also make everything optional? In which case, the correct way to follow the pattern would be to also leave the constructor parameterless and configure everything via properties.