3 ms·
My take away was essentially: "if you try, you can write non-portable haskell code". I don't really get the significance.
by jeffdavis 16y ago
My take away was essentially: "if you try, you can write non-portable haskell code". I don't really get the significance.
- calpaterson 16y agoOne of the intentions of Haskell is to provide certain guarantees about whatever pure code is compiled. These guarantees are important for some applications (especially concurrency and distributed parallelism). If these guarantees are lies, then there can be a problem. None of the examples are massively series, but hopefully it should prove the point that this topic matters.
- calpaterson 16y agoCan't believe I wrote "series" instead of serious. :|