3 ms·
Not sure how Ruby has better documentation. This is the official Ruby docs vs .Net's https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/2.7.0/ https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/2.7.0/ h
by DonnyV 6y ago
Not sure how Ruby has better documentation. This is the official Ruby docs vs .Net's
https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/2.7.0/ https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/2.7.0/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/ https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/
Ruby's site even does that visual thing where you can tell it was made only to be seen on Macs.
- steinuil 6y agoIt's been a while since I've used Ruby for anything serious, but I think most people still use https://ruby-doc.org/ https://ruby-doc.org/ for the official docs. What you linked is the site generated by rdoc, which has never looked very good.
- cosarara 6y agoWhat visual thing?
- manigandham 6y agoLight skinny fonts that are hard to read. The absolute opposite of how text on a documentation site should be.