4 ms·
Cheap is a poor word choice for your brand; it invokes bad associations for both of your audiences. Consider something implying speed instead, which signals "i
by marcusestes 15y ago
Cheap is a poor word choice for your brand; it invokes bad associations for both of your audiences.
Consider something implying speed instead, which signals "inexpensive," without suggesting a shoddy product.
- acangiano 15y agoTrue. It has worked well for NameCheap, only because the quality of the product is virtually identical among providers. Unfortunately it's not the case here.
- blake8086 15y agoI suppose I may have to change the name at some point down the line. It is quite difficult to find good names. In my search, I sat down with instantdomainsearch and said "ok, I'm going to come up with at least 100 acceptable domain names", this was the favorite out of everyone I polled. I like the idea of implying "speed" instead.
- njl 15y agoSomebody on here built http://impossibility.org/ http://impossibility.org/, which I've found to be fantastic. You give it a word, it sticks other words around it. I found about half a dozen better names in just a few seconds worth of work.
- blake8086 15y agoWell that's definitely worth a look.
- qeorge 15y agoLove impossibility.org. Wonderful tool. Does FinishedCode.com do anything for you? Its available, and I think it has a nicer ring to it.
- petercooper 15y agohttp://www.bustaname.com/ http://www.bustaname.com/ is also good. You provide the words but it does all the combos (even beyond two words).