3 ms·
So can anyone comment on how we should interpret these benchmarks: a) Across the various Mac models (i.e. why buy a pro vs the air vs the mini). If they all b
by ACow_Adonis 6y ago
So can anyone comment on how we should interpret these benchmarks:
a) Across the various Mac models (i.e. why buy a pro vs the air vs the mini). If they all benchmark the same, what am I paying the difference for?
b) The M1 chip vs a ryzen desktop (naively interpreting this its punching up near a 5950X, which seems TGTBT?). How do these chips compare against the larger TDP competitors if portability and batteries aren't an issue?
b2) Compared to the AMD mobile chips? (i don't have much insight into these)
c) someone else on here posted a Tiger-lake intel chip benchmark beating the M1. Now that makes even less sense to me now, because now there's an intel mobile chip beating the top of the line Ryzen desktop?
Help out an honestly confused individual.
- raihansaputra 6y agoa) Binnings/thermal envelope. The 7 GPU MBA SKU makes it clear that it’s still the same chip with 1 GPU disabled. Kindof like Ryzen. b) Unsure. Apple will definitely come put with a chip more powerful/with more connectivity (>16GB RAM, discrete GPU). Clear head to head will be possible on th ARM iMac release. b2) The current MBP can be compared to that. My prediction is better efficiency + better performance. c) Benchmarks can be very different to each other. Raw compute/AVX compute/Perf per Watt.