3 ms·
Realistically, the kWh is used to determine cost of ownership by most people, not environmental impact. 230~ USD a year to run a 600 dollar product versus the
by serf 6y ago
Realistically, the kWh is used to determine cost of ownership by most people, not environmental impact.
230~ USD a year to run a 600 dollar product versus the initial cost of a 2300 dollar display with little to no electricity overhead -- and both have similar rates of failure with regard to non-display components.. AND that's disregarding 'Samsung Vs. Small-Company-From-Slovenia' being a factor in the purchase.
I understand eink is unique, but that characteristic has to be sold to people as a trait that is worth the difference..
That's a hard sell, if compared directly to one another.
(p.s. backlit displays are tacky, but my house is covered in them. I love it. I'm a tacky kind of person, though.)
- luka-birsa 6y agoHey, don't hold our heritage against us and rather swing by our Valley office when C-19 allows us to meet. On the subject of price - I fully agree with you - the price for sure can't be justified just by energy savings. It's a completely different product, with totaly different features and use cases. And yes, using it just for reading the news is costly. I do like I how it looks tho, but that's just me. :)