3 ms·
Thank you! I really appreciate your explanation. By those definitions, shouldn't the number of pixels (circle area) reflect the deviation, rather than what it
by palish 16y ago
Thank you! I really appreciate your explanation.
By those definitions, shouldn't the number of pixels (circle area) reflect the deviation, rather than what it currently does (the square deviation, aka variance)?
In that case, the area should grow proportionally to the deviation, not to the variance.
- eru 16y agoYou're welcome. I don't know what it should do. Showing variance is fine, and my professor for probability theory actually preferred variance over standard deviation.